THE FREEDOM CYCLE Files

Banking has never had a brighter light shone on it. Read how the program of Poverty Power was initiated and control over the world systemized.....more

The Gulf Of Mexico Oil Spill - behind the event lies deeper dirt......more


The Great Cancer Racket - Your Cure is not in the Machine - that's what kills you - read more




WARNING: Some of this material may seem to be far fetched, unbelievable, or difficult to see why and how these things could happen "in your name".

The nature of power is that there needs to be control, be it benign or malign.

Without it there can be no agenda mobilized for or against those under control.

We like to feel we are being looked after. The parent systems of our youth are deeply ingrained and for many unchanged patterns, well past their sell by date.

When these are dysfunctional and/or outmoded, that disfunction is added to the adult mixes of behavior.

The greatest assets we individually can bring to any situation are fine discrimination, neutrality of emotion and a fiercesome intelligence of investigation.

Reports and background to Events that leave a paper Trail


The Shadow of the Mammogram

It's official: Mammograms cause breast cancer by inundating tissues with ionizing radiation that causes DNA mutations.

That's why mammography is a brilliant business model for the cancer industry: If women get annual mammograms, sooner or later they'll find a tumor caused by the mammography! (And then they'll say "Good thing we caught it early, huh?")

Sherry Baker reports the results of this scientific research in today's feature article:

Yes, here is a business plan based upon the premise that there are an endless supply of morons who will believe anything they are told.

NATURAL NEWS Article

Why radiation causes breast cancer

(NaturalNews) It's well-established that exposure to ionizing radiation can trigger mutations and other genetic damage and cause normal cells to become malignant. So it seems amazing how mainstream medicine frequently dismisses the idea that medical imaging tests from mammograms to CT scans could play much of a role in causing breast cancer. Take this example from the web site for Cornell University's Program on Breast Cancer and Environmental Risk Factors:

In answer to the question "Is ionizing radiation a cause of breast cancer?", the Cornell experts say "Yes" and note ".. female breast tissue is highly susceptible to radiation effects." But then they pooh-pooh the possible hazard from mammography x-rays saying the risk …"should not be a factor in individual decisions to undergo this procedure. The same is true for most diagnostic x-ray procedures."

If that's not confusing enough, they turn around and state: "Nonetheless, unnecessary radiation exposures should be avoided and continued vigilance is required to ensure that the benefits associated with specific procedures outweigh the future risks."

Common sense suggests there is plenty of reason to be worried about radiation causing breast cancer. And now there's a new reason to be concerned. Researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have discovered that radiation exposure can alter cells' microenvironment (the environment surrounding cells). And that greatly raises the odds future cells will become cancerous.

The reason is that signals from a cell's microenvironment, altered by radiation exposure, can cause a cell's phenotype (made up of all its biochemical and physical characteristics) to change by regulating or de-regulating the way a cell uses its genes. The result can be a cell that not only becomes pre-cancerous but that passes this pre-malignant condition on to future cells.

"Our work shows that radiation can change the microenvironment of breast cells, and this in turn can allow the growth of abnormal cells with a long-lived phenotype that have a much greater potential to be cancerous," Paul Yaswen, a cell biologist and breast cancer research specialist with Berkeley Lab's Life Sciences Division, said in a statement to the press.

"Many in the cancer research community, especially radiobiologists, have been slow to acknowledge and incorporate in their work the idea that cells in human tissues are not independent entities, but are highly communicative with each other and with their microenvironment," he added.

For their study, Yaswen and his research teams used human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs), the cells that line breast ducts, where most breast cancers start. When placed in a culture dish, the vast majority of HMECs display a phenotype that allows them to divide between five and 20 times until they become what is known as senescent, or unable to divide. However, there are also some variants of these cells which have a phenotype that allows them to continue dividing for many weeks in culture. Known as a vHMEC phenotype, this type of breast cell arises spontaneously and is more susceptible to malignancy because it lacks a tumor-suppressing protein dubbed p16.

To find out what radiation exposure does to the cellular environment and how it could impact the future of cell behavior, the Berkeley Lab scientists grew sets of HMECs from normal breast tissue in culture dishes for about a week. Then they zapped each set with a single treatment of a low-to-moderate dose of radiation and compared the irradiated cells to sets of breast cells that had not been irradiated.

The results, just published in the on-line journal Breast Cancer Research, showed that four to six weeks after the radiation exposure, the normal breast cancer cells had stopped dividing far earlier than they would have normally -- and this premature cell senescence had accelerated the outgrowth of vHMECS.

"However, by getting normal cells to prematurely age and stop dividing, the radiation exposure created space for epigenetically altered cells that would otherwise have been filled by normal cells. In other words, the radiation promoted the growth of pre-cancerous cells by making the environment that surrounded the cells more hospitable to their continued growth," Yaswen explained in the press statement.

The researchers pointed out that the levels of radiation used in their experiments were not as much as a woman would be exposed to during a single routine mammogram but were comparable to those a woman could receive during a CT scans or radiotherapy "and could represent sources of concern."

Of course, women are often pushed to get annual mammograms, raising their overall radiation exposure through the years. And, as NaturalNews has reported, previous research has already provided compelling evidence linking mammography to breast cancer.

For example, a report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association's Archives of Internal Medicine found that the start of screening mammography programs throughout Europe has been associated with increased incidence of breast cancer . And a Johns Hopkins study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute concluded radiation exposure from mammograms could trigger malignancies in women at risk for genetic breast cancer

For more information:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146798
http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/factsheet/physical/fs52.radiation.cfm#mammog http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146798
Continued at
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32770754/Study-Shows-How-Radiation-Causes-Breast-Cancer

The Freedom Cycle - A tale of heroes and villans


Get the Inside Snoop in The Dossier
and a chance to have a signed copy
of Dreams and Realities

Sign me in for the Dossier and
if I am one of the first - a signed volume when out
Name:
Email:

::-:: about the author ::-:: contact us ::-:: partners ::-::
The Freedom CycleTM ©2008-2010 - Soon to become a motion picture sensation - all enquiries and info here