Google+

REVERSING
NON COMPLIANCE NOTICES

MAKING THEM PAY FOR THEIR ERRORS

!!!!IMPORTANT INFO!!!!

EMAIL ACTION

Whitelist us so you receive your emails
We are being attacked so you do not
Easy workaround HERE

DAILY UPDATES/NEWS

Taking the illegal government down is not a straight line but we will always feed you latest here so go check, even if there is no update!

Resistance Gets its Payback

Share This Page!

How to Deal with Service of Infraction to Diktats

The Fine and How to Reverse Engineer It

------------------------
A handy little rebuttal works across the board
The Common Law Rights script
------------------------

So they have served notice on you for ....x,y,z
=================================
In the video below you will see how I not only accept the delivery they, the constables are forced to serve, with grace and pleasantry but also make them aware that they now become liable individually, as accessories,  for complicity to a greater crime, that of fraud.

Now bear in mind they, the wee things, are utterly oblivious to this fact, even after their being informed. Yet at some stage in the future it will become apparent they, in their complying with the order to visit and serve, have roped themselves into a chain of events that will end miserably for one and all on that side of the fence.

The Common Law is fairness itself and oozes justice and compassion. What I shall now describe to you is how, when served a notice of fine for £10,000 I am happy and unaffected. First off I must reassure one and all. This threat will never a) have to go through their courts and b) Never be paid. 

How is that, you ask?

Simply because under Common Law no one can force unjust, illegal authority over you. It is tantamount to injury, loss you name it. All crimes under the Law. So that when served such illegal notice from an illegal entity calling itself government, the time comes to return its gift with the most powerful and effective rebuttal there is. The process called Commercial Contractual Agreement.

Now that sounds pretty high falluting, does it not? In essence all this is, is taking 'the other party' - there are only always two parties in disagreement moving to agreement - taking them on that journey to agreement. The fact that the other party may never openly agree, they will however through that omission, agree by default after a certain period of time has elapsed in the process. This agreement then leads to a further opportunity, under the Common Law to seek damages for the harm etc caused. More on that later.

So what we do is stay bright, happy and unruffled, in the knowledge that under Common Law I am sovereign. They will send you a notice or penalty charge, expecting you to pay it or as the good constable said in the film, contest it, appeal. Well, if one imagines we are going to do any of that through the maritime process, then think again. Our process navigates the well known and accepted land based paths of the law of the land, the Common Law. Here we start on the journey of coming to an agreement.

The Three Letter start Process:

So first of all when served such notice, it will contain various allegations of contravention. Let us say:
"You were found to be gathered in a crowd of more that 2 people, against such and such a diktat applied by the Criminal Council of Tyrants blah blah"

There will be perhaps other allusions to wrong doing, and as soon as I have sight of that myself I shall rewrite this somewhat. However for the sake of illustration the exactitudes are of little consequence at this point.

What we are going to prepare to send, in this case the Chief Constable of Somerset and Avon Police, as it is with he/she that the buck  stops, having ordered the minion constables, enforcement officers to carry out an agreed-with diktat from the criminals. We prepare a letter of NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE - like so. This will set up a simple questions to be answered process that inevitably they are unable to fully answer with the material, factual and lawful rebuttal. As they do not after a proper period of 7 days, supply you with full rebuttal, a second letter is sent.

This letter is what is called NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE - This allows them a second opportunity to answer fully the questions posed in the first NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.

As we know they will not be able to. At this point a third letter wings its way to them in the form of NOTICE OF DISHONOUR. This final letter in the first series nails them to the mast of having accepted by non admission, omission, that what was served has no lawful standing. Now of course they will attempt to take this to their courts, where you definitively will not appear. It may be you might wish to  send to the court the evidence that there is no case to answer via these letters. They always have to send you notice of a court hearing where you are able to respond with reasons why you defend your right to not accept there is any charge legally presented and enclose the 3 letter as proof of such.

However you also have the opportunity, under the Common Law, to proceed to the next stage. That of informing and presenting the police, the Chief Constable, a series of correspondence alerting them to the damages that will now be sought and applied in this case of injury. As always your letter process allows for good timely response to rebut from them. They will not be able to as there is not the proof they profess they have right to serve this in the first place. It does take them to the stage where you are now in the position to serve the third and final letter stage.

This stage is where it becomes very serious for the poor servants to criminal action. It is where the Chief Constable now takes the onerous role of becoming obligated in an agreement, already noted and agreed upon by omission, and held financially liable to the damages that are now in process.

Under Common Law it is absolutely lawful to claim damages for injury, loss etc caused by another party. That other party has already 'agreed' the criminal action undertaken by being unable to rebut fully each and every point presented, illustrating the null and void nature of such claims (via previous correspondence).

These next missives begin, first of all, with a letter of NOTICE OF SECURITY INTEREST. This establishes that the Strawman/woman, your fictitious double, being represented by your living man/woman is now in the position of intending to file a commercial injury claim against XXXXXXXXXX, currently valued at GBP£ xxxxxxx.00. This figure will be, let's say, in my case, £10,000 + costs.

Having seven days to rebut anything here, the second part goes out. This then is in the form of an AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION, a lengthy few pages, suitable signed and witnessed by a Notary General with all the palaver of seals and ribbon and the like. Now do not get me wrong. This document is the most powerful document sent or received. It establishes all the facts, the allegations not rebutted and most importantly the signature under oath that what you present is true and faithful to the truth. If any of it is not then you are the one liable for imprisonment. However be reassured this principle and document, served precisely as recommended is solid and has been the basis that all prior wins have been 100% successful.

So delivery by signed and delivered Royal Mail, as all the other letters have been, establishes its lawful delivery. The period given for response is 21 days.

After that period another letter goes out - NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE - this then also has another period of 21 days to respond in a timely and appropriate way. It also places the recipient on notice that the initial damages figure now trebles its value.

Finally a final letter of - NOTICE OF DEFAULT - is served with the advisory that the figure now benefits from what is termed EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. This means that the figure of £10K x 3 x 100 comes into effect. Thus the damages now stand at £3 million. 

This notice is then followed a few days later by the final - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE - again a notarised sealed, witness and signed confirmation of each and every delivery and signed for receipt, every notification served and not rebutted. The other party has 3 days to respond appropriately and in timely manner, otherwise this affidavit becomes the lien it was initiating and a commercial contractual transactional instrument.

As good as cash to whosoever accepts it and turns it into fiat through the keyboard.

A word here about worth of said instrument:

In short this instrument is exactly the same instrument that the cabal, elite and banksters have always and continue to create "money". What is here is precisely the same way they create money. It has been procured in precisely the way they do, on their terms, commercial contract law, so there is  and can never be any questioning its validity. The only difference is that all funds created this way will be for the support and well being of the people. All they can do, illegally mind you, and that can start the whole process in process again, at them! - all they can do is refuse to play.

It is at that point that they will discover we have already set up a perfectly lawful way and means to do what they refuse to implement. That my friends is what is called the financial check mate, they never expected to hit them.

When you discover where their magic money tree is and proceed to build a huge orchard for the People around it, they are sunk. Perfection itself. 

As Amshel Mayer Rothschild is reputed to have said: "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws." Back at yer Amshel 

Your Questions Answered

Totalitarian Non Compliance in Action


We must all equip ourselves fearlessly, as only then do we show who has the power and thus pack all this idiocy into the toilet!
What do you suggest we do as a non compliant gesture of middle finger to all this? LET US KNOW here

===========================

Please love and share this far and wide
The URL to use for this article is :- (copy and paste)
https://thefreedomcycle.com/covid/pub.html#content02-3ll
===========================
Remember if any of our Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube accounts are suddenly deleted, you can find us on MeWe, Minds, VK and Bitchute, but the best way to stay connected is to join the mailing list here.
Long live the resistance and fuck the Banksters' Great Reset.

The PUB is for the People Community at its best The PUB

TOGETHER WE WIN - JOIN US AT THE PUB

THE PUB IS MILLIONS STRONG

WHEN WE CO-ORDINATE MASS NON-COMPLIANCE, NON VIOLENT DIRECT ACTION WE RENDER THE DARK SIDE POWERLESS. ALL THEY HAVE IS THEIR DIKTATS WE HOLD THE POWER TO SAY
NO! NOT IN OUR NAME!
JOIN US NOW 

The Common Law
(Miranda) Right

Here is the Common Law Rights to exercise when harrassed, threatened or any other way intmidated by an authority not one's own

Common Law Right to execute my conscience
=================================
"Under the protection of Magna Carta 2020, you are hereby notified that I am exercising my Common Law right to obey the diktats of my conscience, which provides me with the lawful excuse to resist all forms of government tyranny, for which I cannot be lawfully arrested, punished or penalised.

Please be advised that, should you impede me in exercising this unalienable birthright of every Briton, you will be personally and criminally liable for any injury, damages, harm or loss you cause and everything you say or do will be taken as evidence that you have collaborated with fraudulent, treasonous and murderous government policy."

======================
In the case of the Covid Fraud:
If they respond, as they usually do, by telling you that there is a pandemic and you are bound to follow lockdown rules...
This is what you continue with:
======================
"Freedom of Information responses have proven that there is no pandemic, since every government department has now admitted that they have no evidence that either the virus or its cause exist, as well as the fact that the PCR tests do not detect any virus or disease.

Therefore, should you continue with the enforcement of criminal government diktats which have no force of law, having been given notice of such, I will use all reasonable force necessary to resist your attempt to commit a crime ancillary to genocide and you will be arrested and tried for your crimes against the People."

IMPORTANT STUFF TO KNOW

Please read the following important info before progressing.
Progressing is tacit agreement to terms and conditions as laid out below

These processes are not to be taken as legal advice. They are lawful methodologies that have proven success and in the spirit of what works, pass on to share this information is proffered to help anyone caught in the entrapment of legal process. These processes are specifically encouraged to be used, where the person, addressing a wrong, wishes to not pass through the legal nightmare of court proceedings, as practiced by those resorting to the protection of an Admiralty/Maritime court.

This process denies them that protection and affords the fullest protection to the person questioning any and all allegations made against them under so called legal process. This process is committed under the auspices of the Common Law, that in itself is the highest law known to humankind, except Divine Law that supersedes it. Thus any attempt to contest this process through the courts is null and void and carries no jurisdiction within that lower level.

All processes have been available online for many years as originally created and used by Michael O'Bernicia. It is accepted that full credit is given to Michael O'Bernicia for all these documents available free to use by all who find them useful. It is also agreed that by using these indemnifies the author and this site from any change/misuse these documents might be used for or their outcomes. Their use by whosoever establishes this agreement is made.
Any misuse or charging others will not only invalidate such use but will also be seen as contravening such a contractual agreement as is laid out here and specified as to the terms and uses made of such templates.
======================

This process is free for everybody to use, solely for the express purpose it was intended for, when it was originally published during the summer of 2020 , on MOB's blog site The Bernician.net.

A mandatory condition is and always has been that all who use it must hold harmless and indemnify the author from all potential liabilities, in the unlikely event that the process, when implemented correctly, does not result in the discharge of any fraudulent mortgage claim, mask insult, vaccine demand or other usage it is put up for in the UK.

It can be shared, copied and re-posted, but not without giving due credit to its originating author. Failure to do so will automatically result in the termination of the offender’s right to use the process.

If any individual, group or entity is found to have used this process for commercial purposes, or in the event they have falsely purported to be the creators/owners of it, they will be held liable for copyright infringement and misrepresentation of the facts, nunc-pro-tunc. 

Terminology Used:
NAME OF SERVED VICTIM  - The one refuting the Police Action
By: Upper-Case:Lower - By: Joanna Smith (this written as you would normally write)
Representative for NAME OF SERVED VICTIM = Representative for JOANNA SMITH (this is in capitals)
POLICE PUPPET IN CHARGE- Refers to and must be replaced by the entity's CEO name( usually here the company such as ACRO/ or if direct from Police Station Chief Inspector or sometimes the third party such as ACRO will include the police name where it came from so address that person as well as ACRO type  issuer. If third party has PO Box return address leave out PO box part as then you get a signature confirm of delivery. 
POLICE PUPPET Ltd/plc - Refers to and must be replaced by the company's name. Where Ltd or plc are mentioned then include that otherwise just company/org/educational establishment name.
Company CEOs details and address can always be found in the gov companies house site - https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/companies-house

STRAWMAN - Is your name in caps as is written on driving license, passport etc. It is the Legal Fiction of your flesh and blood self - always written in CAPS

[total losses, plus costs] - Written amount of total [as example]: TWENTY SIX THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED GREAT BRITISH POUNDS STERLING GBP


It is important: ALL LETTERS sent signed for by Royal Mail, (to hold safely as proof of receipt and receipt number to be used later, as and when needed) you can use email as back up but always best hard copy

It is IMPORTANT that time scales as specified are adhered to - ie where it says 7 days means seven days from them signing receipt of letter that you will have with your signed for Royal Mail proof and checked through Royal Mail Track and Trace. Ditto with 21 days. These are days not working days.

The Initial Letter Salvo

First Three Letters

These three are sent as "discovery" letters.
What that means is that they discover whether the recipient has nay case for rebutting these perfectly fair questions. If they do they will respond. Their response is not good enough.
As the police/authority they know there has to be material, factual evidence supplied in order to rebut. It is doubtful they will be able to supply - then we go to the next part!

What We Do

First of all in these templates I am taking the name of the CEO of ACRO, the issuing notice of fines company and his company as the example address. I am not certain if they are the national issuer or merely for a particular area. So if your notice is from someone else and the CEO that sent it is different you must change accordingly. If you get the notice from someone who is not the CEO then if you can establish who the CEO is then great otherwise if they have hidden themselves behind a PO Box that these criminals have used,  then address it to whoever sent it. If it is a PO Box number then you will not be able to obtain assigned delivery confirmation so take off the PO Box number and just use the rest of the address and that has to be signed for!! Good one, eh? The other thing it says as signed by is, on my example, pp for Officer Burge Avon and Somerset Constabulary.

Now that is excellent news for you now have, if you have a name on yours as third party pp, another opportunity to find the address of this particular officer's constabulary and send him/her an identical lettering. what this does do is that at the end of the process you will be affidaviting two protocols. Which means ending up with two commercial financial instrument through the issuing of damages!

Lastly these processes need to be action with the maximum amount of fun and ribaldry, because they are so ridiculous and unlawful the best option is to laugh at this stupidity and make them sweat and eventually pay!

So to the templates:

ARREST/FINE Discovery

Discovery Letters to Refute Legality of Action served by the Police/Authority

------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTICE - PLEASE READ
Discovery letter process for this
Legal and Lawful Notice:


ALL LETTERS sent signed for by Royal Mail, (to hold safely as proof of receipt and receipt number to be used later)

The discovery process is an important element in laying out questions that the other party is asked to answer. This process sets up a 'paper trail' through which subsequent processes are established to have been researched and it shows that a process of asking for certain factual, material and true elements have not been answered along an accepted time line under the Common Law.
Once this discovery process (usually of 6 letters) has completed it then enables to serving party to then proceed with the final letter delivery process
Keep an eye of terminology (above) used and understood in completing these templates. 

============================
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
POLICE PUPPET IN CHARGE (Head of regional/Commissioner or Third party issuer)
METROPOLITAN ENTITY/REGIONAL AUTHORITY/ COMPANY
REGISTERED OFFICE (usually on letter/notice)

 DATE

NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

 Dear POLICE PUPPET IN CHARGE/ACRO CEO/Whoever targeted
 Re: Penalty/Fine notice Number ################

I hereby serve notice that I conditionally accept the alleged [fine,notice of infraction] and will use my very best endeavours to settle and close this matter in the most expedient manner possible, upon receipt of material, factual evidence of the following:

1.  Evidence that the order to serve and impose a penalty notice or notification of such a notice comes from a legal authority based on empirical factual evidence. 

2.  Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law. 

3. Evidence that the crime adjudged to be free speech is law. 

4. Evidence that there is a lawful government in situ that gives it authority to issue such diktats. 
5. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist and thus warrants containment of people in public places to gatherings of 2+1 or whatever the diktat is at this time. 

6. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law. 

7. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals. 

8. Evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.
9. Evidence that you and the police in general are not colluding, aiding and abetting a criminal enterprise operating illegal, fraudulent and treasonous acts against the people. 

10. Evidence that operating your force against the people does not break your sworn oath to protect the sovereign people above all. 

11. Evidence that you are not acting for criminal treasonous entities, where you are sworn to serve the Crown for the people, a Crown that has been deposed. 

12. Evidence that carrying out all acts for the alleged government is not making you through act and association an accessory to criminal fraud.
13 - Proof that SARS-CoV-2 (exclusively and specifically) has been isolated and proven to exist.
14 - Proof that the PCR testing procedure for SARS-CoV-2 is 100% accurate and does not give false positives.
15 - The date and proof of Royal Assent from the Queen and signature of parliamentary approval that the Law was passed which makes it illegal for citizens to peacefully assemble as per their human rights.
16 - Proof of contract where we agreed to participate in following these current guidelines.
17 - Proof that the gathering constitutes a ‘Public Health Threat’.
18 - The evidence proving that the Members of Parliament were given true informed consent when making the decision to first pass the Coronavirus Act and secondly to extend its conditions. We would also like to see the data that they were given with explanation as to how they came to the current conclusion.
19 - We would like to see the nationwide risk assessment that has been taken from which the decision to implement further lockdowns was derived.

 Please deliver these reasonably requested items within 7 days of your receipt of this notice at the mailing location provided herein. Failure to do so will comprise the tacit procuration of your agreement that neither you nor your force are able to verify and validate the alleged offence, which may result in the initiation of a commercial injury claim to cure the injury done to NAME OF SERVED VICTIM.
With sincerity and honour,

            [wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case:Lower
Authorised Representative for NAME OF SERVED VICTIM
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct 
=============================

Following non receipt or inadequate response (meaning ALL questions not answered fully) this goes out

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
POLICE PUPPET IN CHARGE/ACRO CEO (Head of regional/Commissioner or Third party issuer)
METROPOLITAN ENTITY/REGIONAL AUTHORITY/ COMPANY
REGISTERED OFFICE (usually on letter/notice)

DATE

NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear POLICE PUPPET IN CHARGE/ACRO CEO,
Re: Penalty/Fine notice Number ################

 I hereby serve NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. Therefore, please provide me with the following items without delay:

1. Evidence that the order to serve and impose a penalty notice or notification of such a notice comes from a legal authority based on empirical factual evidence. 

2. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law. 

3. Evidence that the crime adjudged to be free speech is law. 

4. Evidence that there is a lawful government in situ that gives it authority to issue such diktats.
5. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist and thus warrants containment of people in public places to gatherings of 2+1 or whatever the diktat is at this time. 

6. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law. 

7. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals. 

8. Evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.
9. Evidence that you and the police in general are not colluding, aiding and abetting a criminal enterprise operating illegal, fraudulent and treasonous acts against the people. 

10. Evidence that operating your force against the people does not break your sworn oath to protect the sovereign people above all. 

11. Evidence that you are not acting for criminal treasonous entities, where you are sworn to serve the Crown for the people, a Crown that has been deposed. 

12. Evidence that carrying out all acts for the alleged government is not making you through act and association an accessory to criminal fraud.
13 - Proof that SARS-CoV-2 (exclusively and specifically) has been isolated and proven to exist.
14 - Proof that the PCR testing procedure for SARS-CoV-2 is 100% accurate and does not give false positives.
15 - The date and proof of Royal Assent from the Queen and signature of parliamentary approval that the Law was passed which makes it illegal for citizens to peacefully assemble as per their human rights.
16 - Proof of contract where we agreed to participate in following these current guidelines.
17 - Proof that the gathering constitutes a ‘Public Health Threat’.
18 - The evidence proving that the Members of Parliament were given true informed consent when making the decision to first pass the Coronavirus Act and secondly to extend its conditions. We would also like to see the data that they were given with explanation as to how they came to the current conclusion.
19 - We would like to see the nationwide risk assessment that has been taken from which the decision to implement further lockdowns was derived.

Failure to deliver these reasonably requested items within 7 days of your receipt of this notice at the mailing location provided herein will comprise the tacit procuration of your agreement that your company is unable to verify and validate the alleged fine, and in so doing, your company may be in breach of the Fraud Act 2006, which clearly states:
3. Fraud by failing to disclose information
A person is in breach of this section if he— (a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he is under a legal duty to disclose, and (b) intends, by failing to disclose the information— (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

In the event that this notice is dishonoured and it is established by the facts of the matter that your company has committed fraud, please take notice that NAME OF SERVED VICTIM will begin any and all administrative and/or judicial proceedings deemed necessary, in order to recover three times the value of your company’s invalid claim in damages, plus the principal allegedly owed.

With sincerity and honour,

            [wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case:Lower
Authorised Representative for NAME OF SERVED VICTIM
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct
=============================

They then have refused or simply not replied with full answers to your questions - this then goes out

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
POLICE PUPPET IN CHARGE/ACRO CEO (Head of regional/Commissioner or Third party issuer)
METROPOLITAN ENTITY/REGIONAL AUTHORITY/ COMPANY
REGISTERED OFFICE (usually on letter/notice)

DATE

NOTICE OF DISHONOUR

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT 

Dear POLICE PUPPET IN CHARGE/ACRO CEO,

Re: Penalty/Fine notice Number ################ 

Following your company’s dishonour of the NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated ______________ and the NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ____________, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DISHONOUR.

For the avoidance of doubt, pursuant to the terms set forth in the aforementioned notices, POLICE CONSTABULARY/ACRO COMPANY and NAME OF SERVED VICTIM are now in agreement that:

1. There is no evidence that the order to serve and impose a penalty notice or notification of such a notice comes from a legal authority based on empirical factual evidence. 

2. There is no evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law. 

3. There is no evidence that the crime adjudged to be free speech is law. 

4. There is no evidence that there is a lawful government in situ that gives it authority to issue such diktats.
5. There is no evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist and thus warrants containment of people in public places to gatherings of 2+1 or whatever the diktat is at this time. 

6. There is no evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law. 

7. There is no evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals. 

8. There is no evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.
9. There is no evidence that you and the police in general are not colluding, aiding and abetting a criminal enterprise operating illegal, fraudulent and treasonous acts against the people. 

10. There is no evidence that operating your force against the people does not break your sworn oath to protect the sovereign people above all. 

11. There is no evidence that you are not acting for criminal treasonous entities, where you are sworn to serve the Crown for the people, a Crown that has been deposed. 

12. There is no evidence that carrying out all acts for the alleged government is not making you through act and association an accessory to criminal fraud.
13 - There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 (exclusively and specifically) has been isolated and proven to exist.
14 - There is no proof that the PCR testing procedure for SARS-CoV-2 is 100% accurate and does not give false positives.
15 - There is no evidence to show the date and proof of Royal Assent from the Queen and signature of parliamentary approval that the Law was passed which makes it illegal for citizens to peacefully assemble as per their human rights.
16 - There is no proof of contract where we agreed to participate in following these current guidelines.
17 - There is no proof that the gathering constitutes a ‘Public Health Threat’.
18 - There is no evidence proving that the Members of Parliament were given true informed consent when making the decision to first pass the Coronavirus Act and secondly to extend its conditions. We would also like to see the data that they were given with explanation as to how they came to the current conclusion.
19 - There is no evidence showing the nationwide risk assessment that has been taken from which the decision to implement further lockdowns was derived.

With sincerity and honour,

            [wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case:Lower
Authorised Representative for NAME OF SERVED VICTIM
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct 

When this is not responded to or does not comply with original requests then 
the next stage of letters goes out:

Share This Page!

IMPORTANT STUFF TO KNOW

Please read the following important info before progressing.
Progressing is tacit agreement to terms and conditions as laid out below

These processes are not to be taken as legal advice. They are lawful methodologies that have proven success and in the spirit of what works, pass on to share this information is proffered to help anyone caught in the entrapment of legal process. These processes are specifically encouraged to be used, where the person, addressing a wrong, wishes to not pass through the legal nightmare of court proceedings, as practiced by those resorting to the protection of an Admiralty/Maritime court.

This process denies them that protection and affords the fullest protection to the person questioning any and all allegations made against them under so called legal process. This process is committed under the auspices of the Common Law, that in itself is the highest law known to humankind, except Divine Law that supersedes it. Thus any attempt to contest this process through the courts is null and void and carries no jurisdiction within that lower level.

All processes have been available online for many years as originally created and used by Michael O'Bernicia. It is accepted that full credit is given to Michael O'Bernicia for all these documents available free to use by all who find them useful. It is also agreed that by using these indemnifies the author and this site from any change/misuse these documents might be used for or their outcomes. Their use by whosoever establishes this agreement is made.
Any misuse or charging others will not only invalidate such use but will also be seen as contravening such a contractual agreement as is laid out here and specified as to the terms and uses made of such templates.
======================

This process is free for everybody to use, solely for the express purpose it was intended for, when it was originally published during the summer of 2020 , on MOB's blog site The Bernician.net.

A mandatory condition is and always has been that all who use it must hold harmless and indemnify the author from all potential liabilities, in the unlikely event that the process, when implemented correctly, does not result in the discharge of any fraudulent mortgage claim in the UK.

It can be shared, copied and re-posted, but not without giving due credit to its originating author. Failure to do so will automatically result in the termination of the offender’s right to use the process.

If any individual, group or entity is found to have used this process for commercial purposes, or in the event they have falsely purported to be the creators/owners of it, they will be held liable for copyright infringement and misrepresentation of the facts, nunc-pro-tunc. 

Terminology Used:
NAME OF SERVED VICTIM - Is Name OF STRAWMAN/WOMAN (the name they use from driving license etc)
By: Upper-Case:Lower - By: Joanna Smith  (in other words normal capital and lower case for rest of name - Living Man/woman)
Representative for NAME OF SERVED VICTIM - Representative for JOANNA SMITH (Strawman/woman)
HEAD POLICE PUPPET - Refers to and must be replaced by the Chief Constable of region or if it is going to head of Metropolitan Police, their name (present incumbent - Cressida Dick) City of London Head : Commissioner Ian Dyson . 
POLICE PUPPET AUTHORITY - Refers to and must be replaced by the METROPOLITAN ENTITY. Greater Manchester Police Authority, Greater London Police Authority, City of London Authority etc.
Company CEOs details and address can always be found in the gov companies house site - 
It is important: ALL LETTERS sent signed for by Royal Mail, (to hold safely as proof of receipt and receipt number to be used later, as and when needed)

Share This Page!

Fines Letter Protocol

Security of Interest Notice Affidavit of Obligation and more

------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTICE - PLEASE READ
Process leading on from first part of process
Legal and Lawful Notice:


ALL LETTERS sent signed for by Royal Mail, (to hold safely as proof of receipt and receipt number to be used later)

This part of the process is where the potential for seeking damages under the Common Law for failure to ascertain and
/or obtain full rebuttal of questions asked, comes into operation.
It starts with Notice of Security of Interest that is followed by an Affidavit of Obligation, that itself is followed by a Notice of Dishonour with Opportunity to Cure followed by a final Default Notice. Finally another, shorter Affidavit of Service and Non Response is finalised. This ends the process. After 90 days from the initial Affidavit being served the paperwork with all proofs of posting etc make up the Commercial Financial Instrument that is created.

Keep an eye of terminology (above) used and understood in completing these templates. 


============================
First of all in these templates I am taking the name of the CEO of ACRO, the issuing notice of fines company and his company as the example address. I am not certain if they are the national issuer or merely for our area. So if your notice is from someone else and the CEO that sent it is different you must change accordingly. If you get the notice from someone who is not the CEO then if you can establish who the CEO is then great otherwise if they have hidden themselves behind a PO Box that these criminals have then address it to whoever sent it. If it is a PO Box number then you will not be able to obtain assigned delivery confirmation so take off the PO Box number and just use the rest of the address and that has to be signed for!! Good one, eh? The other thing it says as signed by is, on my example,  pp for Officer Burge Avon and Somerset Constabulary.

Now that is excellent news, for you now have if that is on yours as third party pp, another opportunity to find the address of this particular officer and send him/her an identical lettering. what this does do is that at the end of the process you will be 'affidaviting' two for the price of one, as it were. Which means ending up with a commercial financial instrument through the issuing of damages that then a doubled by dint of two people being lettered! You'll get it later!

So the templates:


PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS


DATE

NOTICE OF SECURITY OF INTEREST

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

 Dear Robert Price,

 Pursuant to the clearly expressed terms of your company’s dishonour of NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________, NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ______________________  and the NOTICE OF DISHONOUR served on _____________________ ,  I hereby serve NOTICE OF INTEREST.

 For the avoidance of doubt, STRAWMAN intends to file a commercial injury claim against ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd, currently valued at GBP £ 200/400/800/1,600/3,200/6,400,10,000( choose your amount) (WHATEVER YOU HAVE CHOSEN GREAT BRITISH POUNDS STERLING). (Please note the figures are merely an example, you may wish to make it more or less, however damages under Common Law is always in the remit of the complainant[that's you]. Remember to delete this note in final letter!! If you feel that the worry and stress is of an amount of your choosing then add that to the amount you were to be fined)

The DEBTOR has seven (7) days from service of this notice to raise any issues, disputes or counterclaims pertaining to this matter.


With sincerity and honour,

            [wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted 


=============================
This then getting no salient response will incur the raising of an affidavit, well two actually in the whole process and it is worth bearing in mind that they will cost £100 a pop so best that add that to the sum above you are claiming as Lien as when this moves down the line the figure quoted here first off gets trebled, then when its run its lettering course will draw Exemplary damages which will be x 100. So the eventual toll on the individual lined is pretty big for a paltry fine!

Following non receipt or inadequate response (meaning ALL questions not answered fully) the affidavit goes out:
This Affidavit and final affidavit will have to be notarised and sealed by an official Notary Public. This is important for assuring the validity of the final commercial financial instrument that will be ultimately created ( Please do not listen to those that tell you it is not important, or just three independent signatures are all that is needed. You either do this total process as laid out or suffer the consequences of changing yourself, wherein the author of this work and this site will not be held in any way responsible for subsequent happenings or losses - as in the declared terms and conditions of usage.)

====================================


Affidavit of Obligation
Commercial Lien
A Verified Plain Statement of Fact


The Parties
Claimant:
Upper-case: Lower
Authorised Representative STRAWMAN
MAILING LOCATION
Hereinafter known as “Lien Claimant”

Respondent:
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS
Hereinafter known as “Lien Debtor”

**The Laws of Commerce**

All are equal under the law. See Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: No one is above the law; Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.

In commerce, truth is sovereign. See Exodus 20:16; Psalms 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8. Legal maxim: To lie is to go against the mind.

Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. See Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12.

An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. See 1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: He, who does not deny, admits.

An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgment in commerce. See Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in court, tribunal or arbitration forum consists of a contest of commercial affidavits, wherein the points remaining unrebutted at the end of the contest stand as the truth to which the judgment of the law is applied.

He who leaves the field of battle first (does not respond appropriately to an Affidavit) loses by default. See Book of Job; Matt 10:22. Legal maxim: He who does not repel a wrong when he can occasions it.

Sacrifice is the measure of credibility. One who is not damaged, put at risk or willing to swear an oath or make an affirmation on his full commercial liability for the truth of his statements and the legitimacy of his actions, has no basis to assert claims or charges, and forfeits all credibility and right to claim the authority to do so. See Acts 7. Legal maxim: He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.

A lien or claim, under commercial law, can only be satisfied by one of the following actions: A full rebuttal by an Affidavit of Truth, point-by-point, supported by evidence and sworn or affirmed at the same level of commercial risk; the satisfaction of the claimant, whether by payment or mutual agreement; resolution by a jury, in accordance with the rules of common law. See Gen. 2-3; Matt 4; Revelation. Legal maxim: If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved

A party injured by the fraud of another may claim triple damages, plus the principal. “And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord: Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.” Luke 19:8.

**Bouvier’s Maxims**

Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. 2 Co. Inst. 252. But sometimes it allows a conclusive presumption in opposition to truth. See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061.

Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est. A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null. Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4.

Culpa lata aequiparatur dolo. A concealed fault is equal to a deceit.

Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies. Dig. 22, 3, 2; Tait on Ev. 1; 1 Phil. Ev. 194; 1 Greenl. Ev. Sec. 74; 3 Louis. R. 83; 2 Dan. Pr. 408; 4 Bouv Inst. n. 4411.

Error qui non resistitur, approbatur. An error not resisted is approved. Doct. & Stud. c. 70.

Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom’s Max. 349.

Ex facto jus oritur. Law arises out of fact; that is, its application must be to facts.

Ex tota materia emergat resolutio. The construction or resolution should arise out of the whole subject matter.

Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.

Fraus latet in generalibus. Fraud lies hid in general expressions.

Idem est facere, et nolle prohibere cum possis. It is the same thing to do a thing as not to prohibit it when in your power. 3 Co. Inst. 178.

Incerta pro nullius habentur. Things uncertain are held for nothing. Dav. 33.

Incerta quantitas vitiat acium. An uncertain quantity vitiates the act. 1 Roll. R.

Invito beneficium non datur. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. Dig. 50, 17, 69. But if he does not dissent he will be considered as assenting. Vide Assent.

Judex damnatur cum nocens absolvitur. The judge is condemned when the guilty are acquitted.

Judicium non suo judice datum nullius est momenti. A judgment given by an improper judge is of no moment. 11 Co. 76.

Manga negligentia culpa est, magna culpa dolus est. Gross negligence is a fault, gross fault is a fraud. Dig 50, 16, 226.

Magna culpa dolus est. Great neglect is equivalent to fraud. Dig. 50, 16, 226; 2 Spears, R. 256; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 646.

Peccatum peccato addit qui culpae quam facit patrocinium defensionis adjungit. He adds one offence to another, who, when he commits a crime, joins to it the protection of a defence. 5 Co. 49.

Quando do una et eadem re, duo onerabiles existunt, unus, pro insufficientia alterius, de integro onerabitur. When two persons are liable on a joint obligation, if one makes default the other must bear the whole. 2 Co. Inst. 277.

Qui non libere veritatem pronunciat, proditor est verilatis. He, who does not willingly speak the truth, is a betrayer of the truth.

Qui non obstat quod obstare potest facere videtur. He who does not prevent what he can seems to commit the thing. 2 Co. Inst. 146.

Qui non prohibit quod prohibere potest assentire videtur. He, who does not forbid what he can forbid, seems to assent. 2 Inst. 305.

Qui non propulsat injuriam quando potest, infert. He, who does not repel a wrong when he can, induces it. Jenk. Cent. 271.

Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.

Reprobata pecunia liberat solventum. Money refused liberates the debtor. 9 Co. 79.

FRAUD ACT 2006
1 Fraud
(1) A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed on subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).

(2) The sections are –
(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation),
(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and
(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position).

Private & International Law UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS

Article 3.8 – Fraud

A party may avoid the contract when it has been led to conclude the contract by the other party’s fraudulent representation, including language, practices, or fraudulent nondisclosure of circumstances which, according to reasonable standards of fair dealing, the latter party should have disclosed.

Article 5.1.3 – Cooperation between the parties

Each party shall cooperate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party’s obligations.

Article 7.3.4 – Adequate Assurance of Due Performance

A party who reasonably believes that there will be a fundamental non-performance by the other party may meanwhile withhold its performance. Where this assurance is not provided within a reasonable time the party demanding it may terminate the contract.

Article 7.4.1 – Right to damages

Any non-performance gives the aggrieved party a right to damages either exclusively or in conjunction with any other remedies except where the non-performance is excused under these principles.

Article 7.4.2 – Full compensation

(1) The aggrieved party is entitled to full compensation for harm sustained as a result of the non-performance. Such harm includes both any loss which it suffered and any gain of which it was deprived, taking into account any gain to the aggrieved party resulting from its avoidance of cost or harm
(2) Such harm may be nonpecuniary and includes, for instance, physical suffering and emotional distress.

Allegations:

The following allegations arise from the conduct of Lien Debtor & the Agents of, indirectly and/or directly, in relation to an alleged agreement between the parties, having regard to Vaccination

1. There is no evidence that the order to serve and impose a penalty notice or notification of such a notice comes from a legal authority based on empirical factual evidence. 

2. There is no evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law. 

3. There is no evidence that the crime adjudged to be free speech is law. 

4. There is no evidence that there is a lawful government in situ that gives it authority to issue such diktats.
5. There is no evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist and thus warrants containment of people in public places to gatherings of 2+1 or whatever the diktat is at this time. 

6. There is no evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law. 

7. There is no evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals. 

8. There is no evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.
9. There is no evidence that you and the police in general are not colluding, aiding and abetting a criminal enterprise operating illegal, fraudulent and treasonous acts against the people. 

10. There is no evidence that operating your force against the people does not break your sworn oath to protect the sovereign people above all. 

11. There is no evidence that you are not acting for criminal treasonous entities, where you are sworn to serve the Crown for the people, a Crown that has been deposed. 

12. There is no evidence that carrying out all acts for the alleged government is not making you through act and association an accessory to criminal fraud.
13 - There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 (exclusively and specifically) has been isolated and proven to exist.
14 - There is no proof that the PCR testing procedure for SARS-CoV-2 is 100% accurate and does not give false positives.
15 - There is no evidence to show the date and proof of Royal Assent from the Queen and signature of parliamentary approval that the Law was passed which makes it illegal for citizens to peacefully assemble as per their human rights.
16 - There is no proof of contract where we agreed to participate in following these current guidelines.
17 - There is no proof that the gathering constitutes a ‘Public Health Threat’.
18 - There is no evidence proving that the Members of Parliament were given true informed consent when making the decision to first pass the Coronavirus Act and secondly to extend its conditions. We would also like to see the data that they were given with explanation as to how they came to the current conclusion.
19 - There is no evidence showing the nationwide risk assessment that has been taken from which the decision to implement further lockdowns was derived.
20. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor, by its dishonour of Lien Claimant’s NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________ , as well as NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ________________________ and NOTICE OF DISHONOUR dated ________________________ is not concealing material facts pertaining to any alleged existing and legally enforceable agreement between the parties, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.


LEDGERING
For the avoidance of doubt, this document is a security interest expressing the value of Lien Claimant’s natural, equitable and legal rights over all the property, income and assets of Lien Debtor, to the value expressed within. Lien Claimant hereby charges this instrument in the sum of [total losses, plus costs] TOTAL LIEN VALUE: GBP £#,###,###.00, subject to additional default charges.

DEFAULT CONDITIONS

Lien Debtor is given 21 days to deliver to Lien Claimant material evidence in support of an appropriate point-for-point rebuttal under oath or affirmation of the foregoing allegations. Failure to repudiate or rebut with material evidence every allegation made will result in Lien Debtor becoming immediately liable for the payment of [total losses, plus costs]. Triple Damages of [total losses, plus costs x3] will also be added to the debt if Lien Debtor’s default is not cured. In the event that it is not cured within 90 days, Lien Debtor becomes liable for Exemplary Damages of [total losses, plus costs x 100] following NOTICE OF DEFAULT.

AFFIRMATION

I, Upper-Case: Lower,
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant), hereby affirm upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that I have read all of the contents of this Affidavit of Obligation, and to the very best of my knowledge, I believe that the facts expressed herein are true, correct and complete.


[wet signature here]

Executed by:Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant)
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
IMPORTANT NOTE: Not to be included in final affidavit
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
We are finding there is more and more pressure on Notary Publics to not engage with these affidavits
Thus since we have a work around this problem - which undoubtedly arises from the wish to stop our lawful actions - we suggest that people take their own decision as to which route they wish to take.

Either you carry on the Notary Public route which could cost £100 cost for each of the two affidavits to be witnessed

or

You go the route of having 3 (three) independent witnesses (eg not family) sign and witness your signature. This would mean gathering three witnesses together to witness your signature

The format for that if you are replacing the Notary format is here below

DELETE THE STUFF YOU ARE NOT USING HERE - I know that may be common sense but people do often forget to!!!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Version 1 - Three witnesses format - REMOVE all in red before printing
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



VERIFICATION

The execution of this affidavit is hereby witnessed, on the _______ day of the month of _______________,
in the year two thousand and twenty one:

Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Version 2 - Notary Public - REMOVE all in red before printing
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

VERIFICATION

Affirmed, autographed and sealed before me, _________________,
on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.
Notary Public: Notary Seal: Notary Public’s office location.


Signed & Sealed By: __________________________________________

[this end bit below must remain whichever verification you use - take this out before final print]

NOTICE is hereby given that the Lien Debtor has twenty one (21) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Obligation to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the allegations contained herein. Failure to rebut, deny or otherwise disprove any of the allegations will be construed as Lien Debtors’ affirmation that said allegations have been proven to be true, correct and complete. Void where prohibited by law. 

=============================

If they then have refused or simply not replied with full answers to your questions - this then goes out

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS


COMPANY NUMBER (if there is one found at Companies House)

LICENSE NUMBER (Ditto)Otherwise delete

DATE

NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear Robert Price,

Your company has failed to respond to the AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________.

Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE.

Robert Price has twenty one (21) days in which to deliver an appropriate and timely response.
Triple damages now apply.


With sincerity and honour,

            [wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted

======================================

When this is not responded to or does not comply with original requests then
the next and final letter goes out: This is then followed by a final Affidavit of Service and Non Response


PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS


COMPANY NUMBER (if there is one found at Companies House)

LICENSE NUMBER (not essential)

DATE

NOTICE OF DEFAULT
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear Robert Price,

Your company has failed to respond to the notarised AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________, as well as NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________.

Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DEFAULT. Exemplary damages now apply.

With sincerity and honour,

            [wet signature here]


By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted



It is then perfectly acceptable to send the final affidavit a couple of days later:

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
This document summarises all the documentation/paper trail
that has been exchange with the other party. It is a verified plain statement of facts.

=====================
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
A Verified Plain Statement of the Facts

I, Upper-Case: Lower, an adult flesh and blood (wo)man of sound mind, do state unequivocally that I served the following documents on Robert Price, CEO of ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS LTS (Respondent), by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery:

1. NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
2. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
3. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
4. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTEREST DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
5. AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
6. NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
7. NOTICE OF DEFAULT DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################.

The Respondent has subsequently failed to deliver appropriate and timely responses to any of the documents listed above.

AFFIRMATION

I hereby affirm and declare upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true, complete and correct, and not misleading.
By: Your Name [Upper-Case:Lower ]   ________________________________
Address:
Postcode:


Wet signature here

Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant) [Keep Lien Claimant in]
All Rights Reserved – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted

============================================

IMPORTANT NOTE: Not to be included in final affidavit

We are finding there is more and more pressure on Notary Publics to not engage with these affidavits
Thus since we have a work around this problem - which undoubtedly arises from the wish to stop our lawful actions - we suggest that people take their own decision as to which route they wish to take.

Either you carry on the Notary Public route which could cost £100 cost for each of the two affidavits to be witnessed

or

You go the route of having 3 (three) independent witnesses (eg not family) sign and witness your signature. This would mean gathering three witnesses together to witness your signature

The format for that if you are replacing the Notary format is here below

DELETE THE STUFF YOU ARE NOT USING HERE - I know that may be common sense but people do often forget to!!!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Version 1 - Three witnesses format - REMOVE all in red before printing
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 VERIFICATION

The execution of this affidavit is hereby witnessed, on the _______ day of the month of _______________,
in the year two thousand and twenty one:

Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Version 2 - Notary Public - Delete the Verification you do not use
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



VERIFICATION



Affirmed, autographed and sealed before me, _________________,
on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.


NAME & ADDRESS OF NOTARY PUBLIC Seal:



Signed: _______________________________


NOTICE is hereby given that the Respondent has three (3) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Service to
rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the statement of the facts contained herein.
Failure to deliver an appropriate response within the stated time will comprise the tacit procuration of the Respondent’s
agreement that the contents of this Affidavit are true, correct and complete, and not misleading.


End of Final Affidavit
================================================


That is it - you are now in possession of a Commercial Financial Instrument following the completion of the 90 day period (that started the date the other party received the first Affidavit)

Share This Page!

Private Criminal Prosecution of MPs | Mark Devlin Talks To MOB On The Good Vibrations Podcast

Here's a conversation I had with Mark Devlin this week on that very subject and much more. Please listen and share far and wide.

Share This Page!

The Declaration of Rights
Magna Carta 2020

The Antidote To COVID-1984 is Magna Carta 2020, a new Declaration of Rights. Please watch, like and share this video far and wide.

Share This Page!

Come on Down the PUB
That is where the real action is

The Pub is a British institution, yet thisPUB (People's Union of Britain) will see us all free and released from lockdowns tyranny, institutions taking all rights and the bloody ridiculous - Join now and we'll give them Non Compliance like they never knew all perfectly peaceful and lawful but with the best British take on a middle finger.Got suggestions we can incorporate? Add them in the Message box!
IMPORTANT: Saves it ending up in Spam Bucket
Whitelist our email address for this form:
[email protected]

Dreams and Realities A book for our time

01

Jonathan Trapman

Jonathan L Trapman is an author, creative writer and photojournalist who has spent the better part of his 45 odd years in public life, learning from his personal experiences, sharing them, listening to others, whose lives have allowed him to open his own mind to a beauty, even within horror, that is transforming and empowering. His written work endeavors to convey, through true tales and fiction, impressions thus garnered. Dreams and Realities can be purchased (signed by the author if wanted) here.

The Freedom Cycle

© 2020 The Freedom Cycle

Contact

Address: Glastonbury, Somerset UK
Phone: (UK)
+44 (0)1225 29 2333
Phone: (US)
+1 864-372-4820
[email protected]

Social