This was in reference to the fact that poetry has been the first to fall in the lunatic educational Covid-Cull field in the UK.
His response was:
"When you take the arts out of the elementary schools systems, you take away a platform of humanity and spirituality and love that you should be giving to a child at that point in time. I have seen this in America where the first things that have been cut were music classes, drama classes, from that it went into art classes.
So what does that leave you with?
That leaves you with very dry subjects that have nothing to do with that which feeds your soul, to feed that part of you that carries your humanity. It is necessary to keep the arts in the schools. Music, theatre, if you can get dancing there, painting, all of those things are what the human being needs. Gardening, put gardening in there. When you take that away from a human being, you are taking away a piece of their soul. You are undermining who that human being is, or who that human being has a chance to be. Absurd, absolutely absurd. I am sorry that is how I feel about it!"
Clarke Peters beautifully verbalises exactly what is being done to, not only the children, the next generations, but also to the people, the adults in this world. Desensitising, obliterating critical thinking, disallowing freedom of expression, speech and freedom of movement. If these actions are not curtailing and stifling life, then tell me what is.
It does not matter which pathetic, specious excuse is ramped up, propagandised without any shred of credibility or discussion. That there are so many that are content to suck up the BS they use to transgress human values, to beat into submission the right of every human being on this blue marble. The fact that they are doing this for ends that have nothing whatsoever to do with looking after us or for our own good, is as criminal as it gets.
There is no consent from the people, whatever they may tell us. Common Law, that law that is above any sort of legal argument they produce is sacrosanct. That they tell us it is irrelevant is yet more lies. The criminal, in your house telling you it his right to steal from you and that you have no right to resist, is that right, let alone legal?
Of course not. When we accept that denial of freedom of any sort is OK, then we have handed our divine right as a free human being to another to dictate to us.
We cry for the atrocities we see happening in the world. We cry for the starving children, the bestial treatment of others in our family of humanity, yet all the time we allow transgression, not only on our doorstep but within our own homes, to be meted out to us, without so much of a word of resistance.
To the "Well we voted them in, so that is our consent" statement . No, we did not and neither is it giving our consent. That can only be through a wet ink signature from each and every one of us. A tick in the box of preference is not consent nor the handing over of our power of attorney to criminals. Even if we are told, "That has always been the way we do these things" never makes it legal or lawful. Common Law, is very precise and clear that consent of the people must be gained. Criminals who by their actions and edicts inflict harm and suffering on human beings, sovereign beings, without their consent do break the most sacred law and must account for their criminality.
On this alone we can and must hold them to account.
That in the UK, in the Withdrawal Agreement Bill Art:38 , Boris Johnson and all who voted that bill through has committed treason. They have declared Parliament to be Sovereign. It is not and never has been. It cannot be unless a coup d'etat has been enacted, which violates the rights of the people.
