Google+

POLICE ARRESTS

How To Respond Under Common Law

IMPORTANT STUFF TO KNOW

Please read the following important info before progressing.
Progressing is tacit agreement to terms and conditions as laid out below

These processes are not to be taken as legal advice. They are lawful methodologies that have proven success and in the spirit of what works, pass on to share this information is proffered to help anyone caught in the entrapment of legal process. These processes are specifically encouraged to be used, where the person, addressing a wrong, wishes to not pass through the legal nightmare of court proceedings, as practiced by those resorting to the protection of an Admiralty/Maritime court.

This process denies them that protection and affords the fullest protection to the person questioning any and all allegations made against them under so called legal process. This process is committed under the auspices of the Common Law, that in itself is the highest law known to humankind, except Divine Law that supersedes it. Thus any attempt to contest this process through the courts is null and void and carries no jurisdiction within that lower level.

All processes have been available online for many years as originally created and used by Michael O'Bernicia. It is accepted that full credit is given to Michael O'Bernicia for all these documents available free to use by all who find them useful. It is also agreed that by using these indemnifies the author and this site from any change/misuse these documents might be used for or their outcomes. Their use by whosoever establishes this agreement is made.
Any misuse or charging others will not only invalidate such use but will also be seen as contravening such a contractual agreement as is laid out here and specified as to the terms and uses made of such templates.
======================

This process is free for everybody to use, solely for the express purpose it was intended for, when it was originally published during the summer of 2020 , on MOB's blog site The Bernician.net.

A mandatory condition is and always has been that all who use it must hold harmless and indemnify the author from all potential liabilities, in the unlikely event that the process, when implemented correctly, does not result in the discharge of any fraudulent mortgage claim, mask insult, vaccine demand or other usage it is put up for in the UK.

It can be shared, copied and re-posted, but not without giving due credit to its originating author. Failure to do so will automatically result in the termination of the offender’s right to use the process.

If any individual, group or entity is found to have used this process for commercial purposes, or in the event they have falsely purported to be the creators/owners of it, they will be held liable for copyright infringement and misrepresentation of the facts, nunc-pro-tunc. 

Terminology Used:
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF - The one making the case for no Vaccination
By: Upper-Case:Lower - By: Joanna Smith (this written as you would normally write)
Representative for NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF - Representative for JOANNA SMITH (this is capitals)
ROBERT PRICE (CEO) - Refers to and must be replaced by the company's CEO name/ head of organisation - This is current CEO of ACRO. 
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd - Refers to and must be replaced by the company's name. Where Ltd or plc are mentioned then include that otherwise just company/org/educational establishment name.
Company CEOs details and address can always be found in the gov companies house site - https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/companies-house

It is important: ALL LETTERS sent signed for by Royal Mail, (to hold safely as proof of receipt and receipt number to be used later, as and when needed) you can use email as back up but always best hard copy

Contest Lawfulness Of Arrests

Police Arrests, Fines and other Infractions Challenged

Holding Police to Law

Share This Page!

Police Arrests, Fines and other infractions

Contest the Lawfulness of arrests and fines under the Covid Era.

Mask Response Letters
Vaccine Threat Response Letters
Police Arrest/Fines Response Procedures
Challenge to Shops, Authorities and Public Place Letters
Mortgage Annulment Letter Process
Reversing Notices of Non Compliance
Holding your MP to Account
------------------------
Herein lies the armour against injustice
Legal and Lawful Notice:

These processes are not to be taken as legal advice. They are lawful methodologies that have proven success and in the spirit of what works, pass on to share this information is proffered to help anyone caught in the entrapment of legal process and unlawful acts. These processes are specifically encouraged to be used, where the person addressing a wrong wishes to not pass through the legal nightmare of court proceedings, as practiced by those resorting to the protection of an Admiralty/Maritime court.

This process denies them that protection and affords the fullest protection to the person questioning any and all allegations made against them under so called legal process. This process is committed under the auspices of the Common Law, that in itself is the highest law known to humankind, except Divine Law that it in turn is answerable to. Thus any attempt to contest this process through the courts is null and void and carries no jurisdiction within that lower level.

All processes have been available online for many years as originally created and used by Michael O'Bernicia. It is accepted that full credit is given to Michael O'Bernicia for all these documents available free to use by all who find them useful. It is also agreed that by using these indemnifies the author and this site from any change/misuse these documents might be used for or their outcomes. Their use by whosoever, establishes this agreement herein made.
======================
Terms of Use and Copyright Notice
This process is free for everybody to use, solely for the express purpose it was intended for, when it was originally published during the summer of 2009, on MOB's old website FreeThePlanet.net, as well as the GetOutOfDebtFree forum.

A mandatory condition is and always has been that all who use it must hold harmless and indemnify the author and The Freedom Cycle from all potential liabilities, in the unlikely event that the process, when implemented correctly, does not result in the discharge of any fraudulent mask wearing order, vaccine demand, lawful right or other intrusion, Mortgage annulment confronted by this letter process in the UK.

It can be shared, copied and re-posted, but not without giving due credit to its originating author. Failure to do so will automatically result in the termination of the offender’s right to use the process.

If any individual, group or entity is found to have used this process for commercial purposes, or in the event they have falsely purported to be the creators/owners of it, they will be held liable for copyright infringement and misrepresentation of the facts, nunc-pro-tunc. 
------------------------ 


Posted here are relevant processes and documents for people to use. In respect of countering the present surge in unlawful arrests due to protest, gatherings or other meetings of groups or crowds, the right for police to arrest people for going about their unalienable right to travel, mix and communicate with each other has made the police cross the line of criminal arrests and maintaining the peace into an area they are not lawfully permitted to operate - civil territory. Unless there is a proven criminal taking place then the police are not allowed to operate or interfere with people's right to be and do what they do.

Present unlawful restrictions and alleged laws, recommendations etc have placed the law enforcement officers in a bind and predicament.

Since it is not as straightforward as the letters of Conditional Acceptance, we shall break it down into sections:

Arrest for being at a rally, meeting of more that 2 people or 50 or 1000s:
If you are arrested at some gathering or other, no matter what charges are laid on you, it is advisable to make sure you are carrying no identification that can identify you as you. Remain silent throughout the process even after they have read you their miranda rights. In fact it would be best, at that moment to read them the Right of Conscience under the Common Law. This is what has been termed the Common Law Miranda rights! Find a copy here. By laying that on them at that point you establish you are outside of their law and jurisdiction. It is advisable to repeat that when you are then subsequently charged in the station. These are the only times you open your mouth.

Meanwhile you remain silent as is your right. If you wish to play clever then do so at your own risk. When they have no name nor address to pin on you and no way of substantiating their charges, whatever they may be they lawfully must release you. However they may detain you for hours in a cell. Endure that in silence, the rewards for isolating yourself will come!

If they are foolish enough to issue a bail notice to you without going through the legal requirement of first charging you, then getting a judge's permission to issue a bail notice, they have made a huge error of criminal action. So let us assume they do issue you with a bail notice - do not sign it, if asked. They will normally input what notes and details they can and then give you a printout with nothing more that they know and nothing of you. They may have been able to guess who you are. In that case a name may be entered. This is fiction! Even if you are Piers Corbyn!

So let us assume you have those white papers. After you get home take a RED pen or a stamp if you have one available and write or stamp across each side of paper "VOID AT COMMON LAW", then get a lain envelope with no address to indicate where it is from and post it to the address printed out on the form. Usually Police Station Bobby Bunting etc

This will create botheration beyond frustration and either you will get a letter back with more BS that you trat in the same way or you will get a letter stating that all charges have been dropped.

It is at this point that you go for the jugular - the letter process. This way it keeps it out of the courts and simply on the pen. They may try to get you to court but any judge, even a twisted one will see they have no hope in hell. Still you are going for wrongful arrest, wrongful incarceration and mental and if there have been, physical damages:

The letter for that is still in production and since it is not needed immediately please be patient: That you can send them flying and close the case is good enough so far. What remains is the back at them charges and also importantly, if you have had to give full biometrics, they need to be returned to you and all record of them expunged from the criminal and official files. Also a word of advice here is you do have biometrics and they ask you to sign at the end, place a cross, dot or anything or even refuse to sign. You do not have to anyway.NEVER put a legible signature of any description


===========================
FINES PROCESS
In respect to fines, be they incurred at a gathering or wherever, through opening a shop, trading or other circumstance, you will find the fine will be issued, we believe, by a bloodsucker acolyte of the Police Services or local authorities. Wherever that fine comes through from and for whatever the amount it is all the same. The process of rebuttal is the same:

Two ways to deal with them:
First and simplest is to take each page, front and back of the fines letter you get and you can as the bail treatment above, take a red pen and write across it VOID AT COMMON LAW and send it back without any extra additional add on. The PO Box number address you send it to is the one. You do not need to have any proof of postage, just send it back.

Why?

Because it is void unlawful and utterly without merit. They know that you know that and those who have two braincells know that. What you may get back is more and you deal with that the same way. Red pen VOID etc.

They will if they decide to pursue it have to go to court to get a summons. The judge will say what for and they will say Coronavirus contravention. Judge will ask, which part, what subsection etc, they will reply "Well we were hoping you might tell us!" then the judge will say this is a civil matter so why are you creating a summons as if it is a criminal matter? He will throw it out saying there is no jurisdiction for criminal prosecution on civil matters. 

Second is the conditional acceptance way



Documentation

To use as stated

These letters are all you need to shut the boss, company, challenger up when confronted with a problem. Works well for all employees, service workers and social workers etc. Read here

Here you will find a vaccine NoCA (Notice of Conditional Acceptance) letter to start a ball rolling. It is up to you whether you take it the full distance, worth it for the damages and to knock heads together. Yet the first three letters affords a paper trail and contractual lawful agreement that whatever points you make are agreed. That the other party fails to actually agree, they do anyway by omission à la Common Law.

See here

This UK-centric Commercial Lien process is not for the faint-hearted or those looking for a quick-fix.
 If you are not in default on a mortgage but have gleaned sufficient knowledge to know that you have been duped, conned and/or misled, then you might consider taking the following course of action against your mortgage bandit, whose entire modus operandi is to get you into default as quickly as possible, in order to take your home by using various statutes as a cloak for fraud.
Please watch The Great British Mortgage Swindle documentary as this will give you an excellent background to the process you are about to launch into

In the event you have already done some sort of discovery process, which asked similar questions to the first six missives here and here, you can start at NOTICE OF SECURITY INTEREST, in which case you will need to delete the documents you don’t send from the list in the final AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
The first six discovery letters start here:

These letters, three of them establishing certain points and demands that were made in whatever notices you were served,  sets them up to be followed by the Notice of Security of Interest that includes damages caused.

Knowing your rights is an important part of your life, especially when they are trying to take them away from us. Here are some simple yet important facts to guide you. They will be added to, of course - Lawful Resistance

Share This Page!

Fines response - Initial

Notice of Conditional Acceptance

------------------------
ALL LETTERS sent signed for by Royal Mail, (to hold safely as proof of receipt and receipt number to be used later)

IMPORTANT: Please make sure you replace all advisory text found in the templates, from the final letter. Read through, make sure you have not left any notes or italicised details in the final letter. Also make sure you have CAPITALISED where stated etc. These are vital and important documents and you must make sure you get them absolutely right.

============================
============================
First of all in these templates I am taking the name of the CEO of ACRO, the issuing notice of fines company and his company as the example address. I am not certain if they are the national issuer or merely for our area. So if your notice is from someone else and the CEO that sent it is different you must change accordingly. If you get the notice from someone who is not the CEO then if you can establish who the CEO is then great otherwise if they have hidden themselves behind a PO Box that these criminals have then address it to whoever sent it. If it is a PO Box number then you will not be able to obtain assigned delivery confirmation so take off the PO Box number and just use the rest of the address and that has to be signed for!! Good one, eh? The other thing it says as signed by is, on my example, pp for Officer Burge Avon and Somerset Constabulary.

Now that is excellent news for you now have if that is on yours as third party pp, another opportunity to find the address of this particular officer and send him/her an identical lettering. what this does do is that at the end of the process you will be affidaviting two for the price of one, as it were. Which means ending up with a commercial financial instrument through the issuing of damages that then a doubled by dint of two people being lettered! You'll get it later!

Lastly these processes need to be action with the maximum amount of fun and ribaldry, because they are so ridiculous and unlawful the best option is to laugh at this stupidity and make them sweat and eventually pay!

So to the templates:
==========================
Each Letter carries your Full Name, Address and Postcode - you can place it how you like or as you normally do when composing a letter - top centre, right are usually preferred
============================================

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS


DATE 
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

 Dear Robert Price,

 Re: ACRO ref Number: ACRO CVXX-XXXXX

I hereby serve notice that I conditionally accept the demands you make re: Penalty Notice - The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions)(England) (No.4) Regulations 2020 whereby I am being demanded to pay £xxxxxxx as a fixed penalty, upon receipt of  the following:

1. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist.
2. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
3. Evidence that gathering in a public place and using the unalienable right to free speech is unlawful
4. Evidence that a requirement to not participate in a gathering of two or more people in public outdoor space is a law.
5. Evidence the The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions)(England) (No. 4) Regulations 2020 is a law and not repugnant under the Common Law
6. Evidence that being part of a ‘protest’, as stated, that has been identified to involve more than 50 people is unlawful in either a democratic society or under the Common Law.
7. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
8. Evidence that I was breaching the peace or committing a common law offence.
9. Evidence that every action you have taken against me is not void at law.
10. Evidence that issuing a fine without the judgment of a court is not a breach of article 12 of the Bill of Rights 1689.
11. Evidence of the witness(es) that is alleged to have identified me as a key speaker [here put in what you were identified for/as
12. Evidence and a copy of a signed witness statement from the informer taken to identify xxxxxxxxx as key speaker/participant.  (This clause is only here if they mention something like..." you were witnessed..." - If that is not there then delete this number)
13. Evidence and copies of all evidence used to arrive at this judgement.
14. A copy from the legal department of the issuing station, showing a legal statement explaining what the process is for imposing fines on British citizens 
15. Evidence that having followed the directions of Lord Sumption who has stated each one has a moral obligation to not observe these diktats, why is his direction and subsequent action to be taken as being unlawful.

 Please deliver these responses to these reasonably requested questions within 7 days of your receipt of this notice at the mailing location provided herein. Failure to do so will comprise the tacit procuration of your agreement that your company is unable to verify and validate the alleged demands, which may result in the initiation of a commercial injury claim to cure the injury done to ]NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF].

With sincerity and honour,

              [Wet signature here]

By: [Upper-Case:Lower] [Your Name ie Jennifer Bloggs - that is what upper case lower case means]
Authorised Representative for [NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF   (In CAPS)]
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct 
=============================

If this does not elicit and complete rebuttal in material and evidentiary form within 7 days then the
second letter is sent as laid out below:
=================================

Each Letter carries your Full Name, Address and Postcode - you can place it how you like or as you normally do when composing a letter - top centre, right are usually preferred
============================================
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS


DATE 

NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear Robert Price,

 Re: ACRO ref Number: ACRO CVXX-XXXXX

I hereby serve NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. Therefore, please provide me with the following items without delay:

1. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist.
2. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
3. Evidence that gathering in a public place and using the unalienable right to free speech is unlawful
4. Evidence that a requirement to not participate in a gathering of two or more people in public outdoor space is a law.
5. Evidence the The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions)(England) (No. 4) Regulations 2020 is a law and not repugnant under the Common Law
6. Evidence that being part of a ‘protest’, as stated, that has been identified to involve more than 50 people is unlawful in either a democratic society or under the Common Law.
7. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
8. Evidence that I was breaching the peace or committing a common law offence.
9. Evidence that every action you have taken against me is not void at law.
10. Evidence that issuing a fine without the judgment of a court is not a breach of article 12 of the Bill of Rights 1689.
11. Evidence of the witness(es) that is alleged to have identified me as a key speaker [here put in what you were identified for/as]
12. Evidence and a copy of a signed witness statement from the informer taken to identify xxxxxxxxx as key speaker/participant. (This clause is only here if they mention something like..." you were witnessed..." - If that is not there then delete this number)
13. Evidence and copies of all evidence used to arrive at this judgement.
14. A copy from the legal department of the issuing station, showing a legal statement explaining what the process is for imposing fines on British citizens
15. Evidence that having followed the directions of Lord Sumption who has stated each one has a moral obligation to not observe these diktats, why is his direction and subsequent action to be taken as being unlawful.

Failure to deliver these reasonably requested items within 7 days of your receipt of this notice at the mailing location provided herein will comprise the tacit procuration of your agreement that your company is unable to verify and validate the alleged demands, and in so doing, your company may be in breach of the Fraud Act 2006, which clearly states:

3. Fraud by failing to disclose information
A person is in breach of this section if he— (a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he is under a legal duty to disclose, and (b) intends, by failing to disclose the information— (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

In the event that this notice is dishonoured and it is established by the facts of the matter that your company has committed fraud, please take notice that [NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF] will begin any and all administrative and/or judicial proceedings deemed necessary, in order to recover three times the value that your company’s actions and insistences have caused in damages, plus full loss of earnings, bonuses and other benefits. [Here you can add whatever losses you may have suffered (physical, mental, whatever through this process of unlawful demands]


With sincerity and honour,

Wet signature here



By: [Upper-Case:Lower ]
Authorised Representative for [NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF]
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct
=============================

They then have refused or simply not replied with full answers to your questions - this then goes out
=====================================
Each Letter carries your Full Name, Address and Postcode - you can place it how you like or as you normally do when composing a letter - top centre, right are usually preferred
============================================

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS


DATE

NOTICE OF DISHONOUR

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear [Robert Price],

 Re: ACRO ref Number: ACRO CVXX-XXXXX

Following your company’s dishonour of the NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated ______________ and the NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ____________, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DISHONOUR.

For the avoidance of doubt, pursuant to the terms set forth in the aforementioned notices, [ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd] and [NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF]  are now in agreement that:

1. There is no evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist.
2. There is no evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
3. There is no evidence that gathering in a public place and using the unalienable right to free speech is unlawful
4. There is no evidence that a requirement to not participate in a gathering of two or more people in public outdoor space is a law.
5. There is no evidence the The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions)(England) (No. 4) Regulations 2020 is a law and not repugnant under the Common Law
6. There is no evidence that being part of a ‘protest’, as stated, that has been identified to involve more than 50 people is unlawful in either a democratic society or under the Common Law.
7. There is no evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
8. There is no evidence that I was breaching the peace or committing a common law offence.
9. There is no evidence that every action you have taken against me is not void at law.
10. There is no evidence that issuing a fine without the judgment of a court is not a breach of article 12 of the Bill of Rights 1689.
11. There is no evidence of the witness(es) that is alleged to have identified me as a key speaker [here put in what you were identified for/as]
12. There is no evidence or copy of a signed witness statement from the informer taken to identify xxxxxxxxx as key speaker/participant. (This clause is only here if they mention something like..." you were witnessed..." - If that is not there then delete this number)
13. There is no evidence and copies of all evidence used to arrive at this judgement.
14. There is no evidence of a copy from the legal department of the issuing station, showing a legal statement explaining what the process is for imposing fines on British citizens
15. There is no evidence that having followed the directions of Lord Sumption who has stated each one has a moral obligation to not observe these diktats, why is his direction and subsequent action to be taken as being unlawful.


With sincerity and honour,

             [Wet signature here]

By: [Upper-Case:Lower]
Authorised Representative for [NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF] 
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

This should kill the whole fines thing dead, as there is a growing reluctance to play along with this charade.

However it was they that started this ridiculous charade and as such it carries the same consequences and outcomes as all the other unlawful crap we have been thrown. We are now in possession of a three letter agreement that all points raised are  agreed with by tacit agreement,  by omission. Therefore to move to the stage of damages would seem to be a good move on the road for reparations for being unlawfully solicited, fraudulently blackmailed.....choose your crime!

When this is not responded to or does not comply with original requests then the next stage of letters goes out. These lay out the damages incurred by the illegal and unlawful demands upon the individual previously ascertained to be factual through the first 'discovery' letters - in other words the agreement between the two parties that what they demanded was unlawful - this next process is a precise and lawful process under the Common Law

Final Part of  Letter Protocol

Security of Interest Notice Affidavit of Obligation and more

------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTICE - PLEASE READ
Process leading on from first part of process
Legal and Lawful Notice:


ALL LETTERS sent signed for by Royal Mail, (to hold safely as proof of receipt and receipt number to be used later)

This part of the process is where the potential for seeking damages under the Common Law for failure to ascertain and
/or obtain full rebuttal of questions asked, comes into operation.
It starts with Notice of Security of Interest that is followed by an Affidavit of Obligation, that itself is followed by a Notice of Dishonour with Opportunity to Cure followed by a final Default Notice. Finally another, shorter Affidavit of Service and Non Response is finalised. This ends the process. After 90 days from the initial Affidavit being served the paperwork with all proofs of posting etc make up the Commercial Financial Instrument that is created.

Keep an eye of terminology (above) used and understood in completing these templates. 


============================
First of all in these templates I am taking the name of the CEO of ACRO, the issuing notice of fines company and his company as the example address. I am not certain if they are the national issuer or merely for a particular area. So if your notice is from someone else and the CEO that sent it is different you must change accordingly. If you get the notice from someone who is not the CEO then if you can establish who the CEO is then great otherwise if they have hidden themselves behind a PO Box that these criminals have, then address it to whoever sent it. If it is a PO Box number then you may not be able to obtain assigned delivery confirmation, however I have found you do get it signed even sent to a PO Box. A workaround would be to take off the PO Box number and just use the rest of the address and that has to be signed for!!  The other thing the letter signed by the CEO "pp for Officer Whatever ", in my example,  pp for Officer Burge Avon and Somerset Constabulary.

Now that is excellent news, for you now have if that is on yours as third party pp, another opportunity to find the address of this particular officer's constabulary (here Avon and Somerset)  and send him/her an identical letter protocol. What this does do is offer two letter protocol opportunities. This ends up with two commercial financial instruments.

So the templates:
================
Each Letter carries your Full Name, Address and Postcode - you can place it how you like or as you normally do when composing a letter - top centre, right are usually preferred
============================================

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS


DATE

NOTICE OF SECURITY INTEREST

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

 Dear Robert Price,

 Pursuant to the clearly expressed terms of your company’s dishonour of NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________, NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ______________________  and the NOTICE OF DISHONOUR served on _____________________ ,  I hereby serve NOTICE OF INTEREST.

 For the avoidance of doubt, STRAWMAN intends to file a commercial injury claim against ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd, currently valued at GBP £ 200/400/800/1,600/3,200/6,400,10,000( choose your amount) (WHATEVER YOU HAVE CHOSEN GREAT BRITISH POUNDS STERLING). (Please note the figures are merely an example, you may wish to make it more or less, however damages under Common Law is always in the remit of the complainant[that's you]. Remember to delete this note in final letter!! If you feel that the worry and stress is of an amount of your choosing then add that to the amount you were to be fined)

The DEBTOR has seven (7) days from service of this notice to raise any issues, disputes or counterclaims pertaining to this matter.
With sincerity and honour,

Wet signature here


By: Upper-Case: Lower Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted 


=============================
This then getting no salient response will incur the raising of an affidavit, well two actually in the whole process and it is worth bearing in mind that they will cost £100 a pop so best that add that to the sum above you are claiming as Lien as when this moves down the line the figure quoted here first off gets trebled, then when its run its lettering course will draw Exemplary damages which will be x 100. So the eventual toll on the individual lined is pretty big for a paltry fine!

Following non receipt or inadequate response (meaning ALL questions not answered fully) the affidavit goes out:
This Affidavit and final affidavit will have to be notarised and sealed by an official Notary Public. This is important for assuring the validity of the final commercial financial instrument that will be ultimately created ( Please do not listen to those that tell you it is not important, or just three independent signatures are all that is needed. You either do this total process as laid out or suffer the consequences of changing yourself, wherein the author of this work and this site will not be held in any way responsible for subsequent happenings or losses - as in the declared terms and conditions of usage.)

====================================


Affidavit of Obligation
Commercial Lien
A Verified Plain Statement of Fact


The Parties
Claimant:
Upper-case: Lower
Authorised Representative STRAWMAN
MAILING LOCATION
Hereinafter known as “Lien Claimant”

Respondent:
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS
Hereinafter known as “Lien Debtor”

**The Laws of Commerce**

All are equal under the law. See Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: No one is above the law; Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.

In commerce, truth is sovereign. See Exodus 20:16; Psalms 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8. Legal maxim: To lie is to go against the mind.

Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. See Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12.

An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. See 1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: He, who does not deny, admits.

An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgment in commerce. See Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in court, tribunal or arbitration forum consists of a contest of commercial affidavits, wherein the points remaining unrebutted at the end of the contest stand as the truth to which the judgment of the law is applied.

He who leaves the field of battle first (does not respond appropriately to an Affidavit) loses by default. See Book of Job; Matt 10:22. Legal maxim: He who does not repel a wrong when he can occasions it.

Sacrifice is the measure of credibility. One who is not damaged, put at risk or willing to swear an oath or make an affirmation on his full commercial liability for the truth of his statements and the legitimacy of his actions, has no basis to assert claims or charges, and forfeits all credibility and right to claim the authority to do so. See Acts 7. Legal maxim: He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.

A lien or claim, under commercial law, can only be satisfied by one of the following actions: A full rebuttal by an Affidavit of Truth, point-by-point, supported by evidence and sworn or affirmed at the same level of commercial risk; the satisfaction of the claimant, whether by payment or mutual agreement; resolution by a jury, in accordance with the rules of common law. See Gen. 2-3; Matt 4; Revelation. Legal maxim: If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved

A party injured by the fraud of another may claim triple damages, plus the principal. “And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord: Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.” Luke 19:8.

**Bouvier’s Maxims**

Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. 2 Co. Inst. 252. But sometimes it allows a conclusive presumption in opposition to truth. See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061.

Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est. A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null. Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4.

Culpa lata aequiparatur dolo. A concealed fault is equal to a deceit.

Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies. Dig. 22, 3, 2; Tait on Ev. 1; 1 Phil. Ev. 194; 1 Greenl. Ev. Sec. 74; 3 Louis. R. 83; 2 Dan. Pr. 408; 4 Bouv Inst. n. 4411.

Error qui non resistitur, approbatur. An error not resisted is approved. Doct. & Stud. c. 70.

Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom’s Max. 349.

Ex facto jus oritur. Law arises out of fact; that is, its application must be to facts.

Ex tota materia emergat resolutio. The construction or resolution should arise out of the whole subject matter.

Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.

Fraus latet in generalibus. Fraud lies hid in general expressions.

Idem est facere, et nolle prohibere cum possis. It is the same thing to do a thing as not to prohibit it when in your power. 3 Co. Inst. 178.

Incerta pro nullius habentur. Things uncertain are held for nothing. Dav. 33.

Incerta quantitas vitiat acium. An uncertain quantity vitiates the act. 1 Roll. R.

Invito beneficium non datur. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. Dig. 50, 17, 69. But if he does not dissent he will be considered as assenting. Vide Assent.

Judex damnatur cum nocens absolvitur. The judge is condemned when the guilty are acquitted.

Judicium non suo judice datum nullius est momenti. A judgment given by an improper judge is of no moment. 11 Co. 76.

Manga negligentia culpa est, magna culpa dolus est. Gross negligence is a fault, gross fault is a fraud. Dig 50, 16, 226.

Magna culpa dolus est. Great neglect is equivalent to fraud. Dig. 50, 16, 226; 2 Spears, R. 256; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 646.

Peccatum peccato addit qui culpae quam facit patrocinium defensionis adjungit. He adds one offence to another, who, when he commits a crime, joins to it the protection of a defence. 5 Co. 49.

Quando do una et eadem re, duo onerabiles existunt, unus, pro insufficientia alterius, de integro onerabitur. When two persons are liable on a joint obligation, if one makes default the other must bear the whole. 2 Co. Inst. 277.

Qui non libere veritatem pronunciat, proditor est verilatis. He, who does not willingly speak the truth, is a betrayer of the truth.

Qui non obstat quod obstare potest facere videtur. He who does not prevent what he can seems to commit the thing. 2 Co. Inst. 146.

Qui non prohibit quod prohibere potest assentire videtur. He, who does not forbid what he can forbid, seems to assent. 2 Inst. 305.

Qui non propulsat injuriam quando potest, infert. He, who does not repel a wrong when he can, induces it. Jenk. Cent. 271.

Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.

Reprobata pecunia liberat solventum. Money refused liberates the debtor. 9 Co. 79.

FRAUD ACT 2006
1 Fraud
(1) A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed on subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).

(2) The sections are –
(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation),
(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and
(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position).

Private & International Law UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS

Article 3.8 – Fraud

A party may avoid the contract when it has been led to conclude the contract by the other party’s fraudulent representation, including language, practices, or fraudulent nondisclosure of circumstances which, according to reasonable standards of fair dealing, the latter party should have disclosed.

Article 5.1.3 – Cooperation between the parties

Each party shall cooperate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party’s obligations.

Article 7.3.4 – Adequate Assurance of Due Performance

A party who reasonably believes that there will be a fundamental non-performance by the other party may meanwhile withhold its performance. Where this assurance is not provided within a reasonable time the party demanding it may terminate the contract.

Article 7.4.1 – Right to damages

Any non-performance gives the aggrieved party a right to damages either exclusively or in conjunction with any other remedies except where the non-performance is excused under these principles.

Article 7.4.2 – Full compensation

(1) The aggrieved party is entitled to full compensation for harm sustained as a result of the non-performance. Such harm includes both any loss which it suffered and any gain of which it was deprived, taking into account any gain to the aggrieved party resulting from its avoidance of cost or harm
(2) Such harm may be nonpecuniary and includes, for instance, physical suffering and emotional distress.

Allegations:

The following allegations arise from the conduct of Lien Debtor & the Agents of, indirectly and/or directly, in relation to an alleged agreement between the parties, having regard to Vaccination

1. There is no evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist.
2. There is no evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
3. There is no evidence that gathering in a public place and using the unalienable right to free speech is unlawful
4. There is no evidence that a requirement to not participate in a gathering of two or more people in public outdoor space is a law.
5. There is no evidence the The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions)(England) (No. 4) Regulations 2020 is a law and not repugnant under the Common Law
6. There is no evidence that being part of a ‘protest’, as stated, that has been identified to involve more than 50 people is unlawful in either a democratic society or under the Common Law.
7. There is no evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
8. There is no evidence that I was breaching the peace or committing a common law offence.
9. There is no evidence that every action you have taken against me is not void at law.
10. There is no evidence that issuing a fine without the judgment of a court is not a breach of article 12 of the Bill of Rights 1689.
11. There is no evidence of the witness(es) that is alleged to have identified me as a key speaker [here put in what you were identified for/as]
12. There is no evidence or copy of a signed witness statement from the informer taken to identify xxxxxxxxx as key speaker/participant. (This clause is only here if they mention something like..." you were witnessed..." - If that is not there then delete this number)
13. There is no evidence and copies of all evidence used to arrive at this judgement.
14. There is no evidence of a copy from the legal department of the issuing station, showing a legal statement explaining what the process is for imposing fines on British citizens
15. There is no evidence that having followed the directions of Lord Sumption who has stated each one has a moral obligation to not observe these diktats, why is his direction and subsequent action to be taken as being unlawful.
16. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor, by its dishonour of Lien Claimant’s NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________ , as well as NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ________________________ and NOTICE OF DISHONOUR dated ________________________ is not concealing material facts pertaining to any alleged existing and legally enforceable agreement between the parties, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.


LEDGERING
For the avoidance of doubt, this document is a security interest expressing the value of Lien Claimant’s natural, equitable and legal rights over all the property, income and assets of Lien Debtor, to the value expressed within. Lien Claimant hereby charges this instrument in the sum of [total losses, plus costs] TOTAL LIEN VALUE: GBP £#,###,###.00, subject to additional default charges.

DEFAULT CONDITIONS

Lien Debtor is given 21 days to deliver to Lien Claimant material evidence in support of an appropriate point-for-point rebuttal under oath or affirmation of the foregoing allegations. Failure to repudiate or rebut with material evidence every allegation made will result in Lien Debtor becoming immediately liable for the payment of [total losses, plus costs]. Triple Damages of [total losses, plus costs x3] will also be added to the debt if Lien Debtor’s default is not cured. In the event that it is not cured within 90 days, Lien Debtor becomes liable for Exemplary Damages of [total losses, plus costs x 100] following NOTICE OF DEFAULT.

AFFIRMATION

I, Upper-Case: Lower,
Authorised Representative for NAME OF INDIVIDUAL DEMANDED OF (Lien Claimant), hereby affirm upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that I have read all of the contents of this Affidavit of Obligation, and to the very best of my knowledge, I believe that the facts expressed herein are true, correct and complete.


           [Wet signature here]

Executed by:Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant)
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
IMPORTANT NOTE: Not to be included in final affidavit
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
We are finding there is more and more pressure on Notary Publics to not engage with these affidavits
Thus since we have a work around this problem - which undoubtedly arises from the wish to stop our lawful actions - we suggest that people take their own decision as to which route they wish to take.

Either you carry on the Notary Public route which could cost £100 cost for each of the two affidavits to be witnessed

or

You go the route of having 3 (three) independent witnesses (eg not family) sign and witness your signature. This would mean gathering three witnesses together to witness your signature

The format for that if you are replacing the Notary format is here below

DELETE THE STUFF YOU ARE NOT USING HERE - I know that may be common sense but people do often forget to!!!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Version 1 - Three witnesses format - REMOVE all in red before printing
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



VERIFICATION

The execution of this affidavit is hereby witnessed, on the _______ day of the month of _______________,
in the year two thousand and twenty one:

Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Version 2 - Notary Public - REMOVE all in red before printing
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

VERIFICATION

Affirmed, autographed and sealed before me, _________________,
on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.
Notary Public: Notary Seal: Notary Public’s office location.


Signed & Sealed By: __________________________________________

[this end bit below must remain whichever verification you use - take this out before final print]

NOTICE is hereby given that the Lien Debtor has twenty one (21) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Obligation to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the allegations contained herein. Failure to rebut, deny or otherwise disprove any of the allegations will be construed as Lien Debtors’ affirmation that said allegations have been proven to be true, correct and complete. Void where prohibited by law. 

=============================

If they then have refused or simply not replied with full answers to your questions - this then goes out
==========================================
Each Letter carries your Full Name, Address and Postcode - you can place it how you like or as you normally do when composing a letter - top centre, right are usually preferred
============================================



PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS

DATE

NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear [Robert Price],

You have failed to respond to the AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________.

Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE.

[Faker in Chief's full Name]  has twenty one (21) days in which to deliver an appropriate and timely response.
Triple damages now apply.


With sincerity and honour,



By: Your Name [Upper-Case:Lower ]
Authorised Representative for [STRAWMAN] 
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted 

======================================

When this is not responded to or does not comply with original requests then
the next and final letter goes out: This is then followed by a final Affidavit of Service and Non Response

======================================


PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBERT PRICE (CEO)
ACRO CRIMINAL RECORDS OFFICE Ltd
Fareham, Hants
PO14 9FS

DATE

NOTICE OF DEFAULT
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear [Robert Price] ,

You have failed to respond to the notarised AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________, as well as NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________.

Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DEFAULT. -  Exemplary damages now apply.
With sincerity and honour,



By: Your Name [Upper-Case:Lower ]
Authorised Representative for [STRAWMAN your name in CAPS]
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted


========================================


It is then perfectly acceptable to send the final affidavit a couple of days later:
=====================================================


AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
This document summarises all the documentation/paper trail
that has been exchange with the other party. It is a verified plain statement of facts.
Below the dotted line the affidavit beings - THERE IS NO NEED to address to anyone
it is a lawful document. It is NOT a letter
=====================

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
A Verified Plain Statement of the Facts

I, Your Name [Upper-Case:Lower ], an adult flesh and blood (wo)man of sound mind, do state unequivocally that I served the following documents on [Robert Price] , (Respondent), by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery:

1. NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
2. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
3. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
4. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTEREST DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
5. AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
6. NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
7. NOTICE OF DEFAULT DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################.

The Respondent has subsequently failed to deliver appropriate and timely responses to any of the documents listed above.

AFFIRMATION

I hereby affirm and declare upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true, complete and correct, and not misleading.
By: Your Name [Upper-Case:Lower ]   ________________________________
Address:
Postcode:


        [Wet signature here]

Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant)
All Rights Reserved – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted

============================================

IMPORTANT NOTE: Not to be included in final affidavit

We are finding there is more and more pressure on Notary Publics to not engage with these affidavits
Thus since we have a work around this problem - which undoubtedly arises from the wish to stop our lawful actions - we suggest that people take their own decision as to which route they wish to take.

Either you carry on the Notary Public route which could cost £100 cost for each of the two affidavits to be witnessed

or

You go the route of having 3 (three) independent witnesses (eg not family) sign and witness your signature. This would mean gathering three witnesses together to witness your signature

The format for that if you are replacing the Notary format is here below

DELETE THE STUFF YOU ARE NOT USING HERE - I know that may be common sense but people do often forget to!!!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Version 1 - Three witnesses format - REMOVE all in red before printing
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 VERIFICATION

The execution of this affidavit is hereby witnessed, on the _______ day of the month of _______________,
in the year two thousand and twenty one:

Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________


Name:


Address.



Signed: __________________________________________

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Version 2 - Notary Public - Delete the Verification you do not use
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



VERIFICATION



Affirmed, autographed and sealed before me, _________________,
on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.


NAME & ADDRESS OF NOTARY PUBLIC Seal:



Signed: _______________________________


NOTICE is hereby given that the Respondent has three (3) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Service to
rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the statement of the facts contained herein.
Failure to deliver an appropriate response within the stated time will comprise the tacit procuration of the Respondent’s
agreement that the contents of this Affidavit are true, correct and complete, and not misleading.


End of Final Affidavit
================================================
That is it - you are now in possession of Commercial Financial Instrument following the completion of the 90 day period (that started when the other party received the first Affidavit)

For those courageous enough to move forward, this site was created. It is not alone in offering content, knowledge and assistance to the self change and educational process, yet it is in total co-operation with all who are of like mind and endeavour. 

Police Arrests fines and other unlawful interferences

Where to Start

The Journey starts here. If you have more information that would be helpful please get in contact

Share This Page!

Dreams and Realities A book for our time

01

Jonathan Trapman

Jonathan L Trapman is an author, creative writer and photojournalist who has spent the better part of his 45 odd years in public life, learning from his personal experiences, sharing them, listening to others, whose lives have allowed him to open his own mind to a beauty, even within horror, that is transforming and empowering. His written work endeavors to convey, through true tales and fiction, impressions thus garnered. Dreams and Realities can be purchased (signed by the author if wanted) here.

The Freedom Cycle

© 2020 The Freedom Cycle

Contact

Address: Glastonbury, Somerset UK
Phone: (UK)
+44 (0)1225 29 2333
Phone: (US)
+1 864-372-4820
[email protected]

Social